Customers are having to purchase additional reporting components. "The reporting in Fortinet FortiGate could improve. It just seems to be easier to manage versus Cisco, Fortinet, or one of the other options I was looking at." However, there have been some issues with other weaker models because they are limited in hardware in resources." "Technical support is responsive." "Compared to other firewalls that I had looked at, I thought Sophos was the better solution. They're not very friendly to people who have to set them up and implement them." "The stability of Sophos XG is very good. I prefer it over other solutions I have used, such as Cisco Meraki and SupportNet, I don't like them. Since I have set them up, programmed them, and manipulate firewall rules, et cetera, the Sophos SG's a better interface. If you've you are using Sophos SG firewalls, they're great firewalls and in many ways, I prefer them to the Sophos XG.
Sophos xg home edition full#
You have to have it to receive the full benefit. Additionally, RED Tunnels allows a Sophos vital to speak to another Sophos vital in headquarters." "What I have found most valuable with the Sophos XG is it's a key component of the Intercept X EDR environment. So, when they provide any kind of firewall, they provide all the features such as anti-spam, antivirus, etc." "We can configure rules with the user, traffic, etc., making it a very versatile solution for our network." "The features that I have found most valuable are first the Web Filter and the Web Application Firewall SD-Wan on Version 18. It's a normal feature and I get to enjoy the ability to switch between services with no issues." "Sophos firewalls are scalable. If I have two subnets coming from the cloud, I'm able to create a type of switch between both of them where if there is traffic on one and has the traffic drop, I'm able to switch to the other ISP without any problems. I can do the same thing for the cloud as well. However, if I have two different ISP, I'm able to create an automatic switch between the two ISPs. "Most of the features Sophos XG has are valuable. We like the OpenVPN clients that can be deployed using pfSense very much." "I like pfSense's security features." I think it just provides the end user, specifically for us small, medium business providers of services, the flexibility we need at the right cost to provide them a higher end, almost enterprise type service." "The initial setup is not complex." "I have found pfSense to be stable." "pfSense allows us to spread the hours of connection and do the filtering on the pfSense site." "My technicians find the pfSense's web interface very useful.
Some people may think you're taking a risk with using Opensource. Enterprises don't always have that kind of money to invest." "The GUI is easy to understand." "What I found most valuable is the cost of the platform, the flexibility of the platform, and the fact that the ongoing fees are not there as they are with the competitor. Other solutions that I have had in the past were very expensive. It is the best way to provide a remote work facility to employees at a very low cost. "It is a very good solution for enterprises that need a VPN for their employees. One area where Sophos XG does come out on top is in the initial setup category.
Sophos xg home edition free#
pfSense performs well, is free of charge, and has superior technical support. ROI: Users of both solutions report seeing an ROI.Ĭomparison Results: pfSense wins out in this comparison.Some users report being satisfied, while others mention a delayed response time. Sophos XG users give mixed reviews for the product’s support. pfSense reviewers report being satisfied with the level of support they receive. Service and Support pfSense offers commercial support in addition to free online support forums and community support.Sophos XG reviewers feel that its price is fair. Pricing: pfSense is an open-source solution and is free of charge.Sophos XG users like its firewall and intrusion detection tools but mention that it lacks integration options. pfSense reviewers say it is robust and performs well, but its user interface needs enhancements. Features: Users of both products are satisfied with their scalability, stability, and VPN features.Sophos XG users agree that initial setup is fast and straightforward. Ease of Deployment: Most pfSense users say that its initial setup is straightforward, but a small percentage say that the setup is complex and requires a higher level of technical expertise.After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below. We performed a comparison between pfSense vs Sophos XG based on our users’ reviews in five categories.
0 kommentar(er)
